Conservative
Americans DO NOT WANT Mitt Romney. That’s pretty darn obvious. He
spends a fortune trying to convince voters, gets a generous amount
of media time to express his message, and still can’t seem to inspire
the Republican base, even when he’s running against the likes of
crooked party hacks Santorum and Gingrich, or against that other
guy – the Congressman from Texas who seldom gets mentioned in the
media. Against opponents like that, the out-of-touch punditry have
long expected that Super Tuesday 2012 would be the coronation of
Mitt Romney.
In the era
of the Tea Party, Mitt Romney is simply too big of a statist and
is too inconsistent with his views to sew up the nomination or the
presidency. Does he like gun control (as past action has shown)
or does he like the Second Amendment (as his current rhetoric is
demonstrating)? Does he want national healthcare (as past action
has shown) or is he against government healthcare (as his current
rhetoric is mostly demonstrating)? Is he against the concept of
the free market (as past action has shown) or is he in favor of
a free market (as his current rhetoric is occasionally demonstrating)?
Republicans
clearly do not want Mitt Romney as a president, but we’re still
only 8 weeks into this 8 month long nominating contest and perhaps
they’ll take a liking
to the number two man in the delegate count – Ron Paul when
they come to realize what a chance they have at choosing a principled
candidate who can succeed at winning the White House. He has the
second largest fundraising apparatus of the candidates, has the
largest volunteer army, appeals to the swing voter, appeals to the
youth, appeals to activists, gives the angry ex-Obama voters on
the left a safe home, attracts independents, Greens, and Democrats,
grows the party, and has a record of winning 12 elections in the
conservative south, all of which nearly ensure that his nomination
would bring about a Republican win in November.
The Adversarial
VP
"But why,"
you might ask, "would Ron Paul want Mitt Romney, a soon-to-be
washed up politician, as his running mate?" Well, because Ron
Paul, a fan of the wisdom of the founding fathers, might appreciate
the pre-1804 thinking of having a man who is his biggest opponent
as his vice president. The idea was encouraged in the U.S. Constitution
Article 1, section 2 before it was altered by the 12th Amendment.
Jefferson, for example, was the vice president to Adams. Boy did
those two not get along. They had some fundamental differences of
opinion.
Mitt Romney
is a saboteur within the Republican Party – a man who pretends to
be conservative, while so effectively being a statist. He would
leave our country spread thin and defenseless by entering into another
war and impoverishing our country for the sake of pumping up our
national ego and, more importantly, his own ego. Mitt Romney would
swear an oath to the U.S. Constitution that he would not uphold.
He would continue the horrible Bush record of deficit spending,
bigger government, and high federal tax rates. He would continue
the dismantling of our civil liberties and economic liberties. He
would support more huge bailouts. He would not stand against the
Federal Reserve Bank.
|
Candidate Romney,
described above, is almost the opposite of Ron Paul who is strong
on national defense, strong on veterans, strong on the economy,
tough on government spending and taxation, a strong adherent to
the wisdom of constitutional government.
As you read
this, Mitt Romney might be sitting somewhere looking over the Super
Tuesday returns, saying to himself "Ron Paul’s so into the
Constitution that he might follow in this tradition of the adversarial
vice president that the founding father’s began." I doubt Ron
Paul’s thinking that, but Mitt Romney when listening to Ron Paul
speak about Mises and Keynes in those pre-debate green room discussions
probably says to himself repeatedly "Is it time to ask him
yet?" Because Ron Paul is starting to look like Mitt Romney’s
last hope – Romney either becomes VP to Paul, riding the septuagenarian’s
coattails for a term before running again himself, or Romney never
again gets a chance to become the president.
Unelectable
Mitt
The elections
of 1976, 1980, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, and 2008 have shown that
an uninspiring
and merely tolerable candidate like Romney fares poorly in general
elections, especially when paired against a candidate who knows
how to inspire his base.
It’s time for
leaders in the Republican Party to face the facts and to start asking
Mitt Romney this important question – if the Republican voters don’t
actually want him and if he is likely to be unelectable, would Mitt
Romney be willing to step down and throw his support behind Ron
Paul in hopes that Ron Paul would consider having Mitt Romney serve
as the 48th vice president of the U.S.?
Mitt Romney
understands that such a move would help bring unity to a splintered
party, and that a Ron Paul candidacy would flank Obama on the wars
and civil liberties in the run-up to the election, would eliminate
the divisive talk on social issues, and would give Republicans the
best chance at a win. It’s time for Mitt Romney to make that phone
call to Ron Paul and to tell him that in exchange for being Paul’s
vice presidential choice, Ron Paul will get Mitt Romney’s full support.
I’m not sure
Ron Paul will accept the offer, but it’s a good place to begin the
discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment