The Vetting, Part I: Barack's Love Song To Alinsky
Prior to his passing, Andrew Breitbart said that the mission of the Breitbart empire was to exemplify the free and fearless press that our Constitution protects--but which, increasingly, the mainstream media denies us.
“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” – “Who guards the guardians?” Andrew saw himself in that role—as a guardian protecting Americans from the left’s “objective” loyal scribes.Andrew wanted to do what the mainstream media would not. First and foremost: Andrew pledged to vet President Barack H. Obama.
Andrew did not want to re-litigate the 2008 election. Nor did he want to let Republicans off the hook. Instead, he wanted to show that the media had failed in its most basic duty: to uncover the truth, and hold those in power accountable, regardless of party.
From today through Election Day, November 6, 2012, we will vet this president--and his rivals.
We begin with a column Andrew wrote last week in preparation for today’s Big relaunch--a story that should swing the first hammer against the glass wall the mainstream media has built around Barack Obama.
The Kochs and Cato. Would Koch control doom the Cato Institute?. By Patrick Brennan
No
one knows quite how the Koch brothers’ recent lawsuit to take
shareholder control of the Cato Institute will end, but it seems fair to
say that it will seriously wound both parties, and thus, the
libertarian cause.
Charles Koch
founded Cato in 1977, in conjunction with the institute’s current
president, Ed Crane, and supplied the seed money (since then, the Kochs
have provided approximately 8 percent of Cato’s donations). A
shareholder’s agreement was drawn up, allocating shares equally to four
men: Charles Koch (who later left the institute); Ed Crane; economist
William Niskanen; and George Pearson, a Koch ally who later transferred
his shares to the Kochs. Thus, the Kochs currently control half of
Cato’s shares. But Niskanen
passed away in October, and his wife essentially now controls his
shares. The Kochs have filed a suit in Kansas to the effect that these
shares should have reverted to Cato or been offered to the shareholders —
giving the Kochs majority control of the institute.Infinite Affirmative Action?
In Eric Holder’s world, the need for racial preferences will never end.
end, but when does it begin. . . . When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?”
Listen to the Audio Version
|
Later
this year, the Supreme Court will review the constitutionality of the
use of racial preferences in college admissions in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas.
The battle lines will once again be drawn over the meaning of the
equal-protection provisions of the Constitution. So it’s noteworthy that
Attorney General Eric Holder has just made it clear he’s never bumped
into a racial preference he didn’t like, and that he sees no time limit
on such policies.
Last month, in an appearance at Columbia University, his alma mater,
Holder made a jarring statement in support of racial preferences, saying
he “can’t actually imagine a time in which the need for more diversity
would ever cease.” “Affirmative action has been an issue since
segregation practices,” he declared. “The question is not when does itend, but when does it begin. . . . When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?”
Obama was not there for Israel ‘every single time’
By Jennifer Rubin
At the AIPAC conference yesterday
President Obama insisted: “But as you examine my commitment, you don’t
just have to count on my words. You can look at my deeds. Because over
the last three years, as president of the United States, I have kept my
commitments to the state of Israel. At every crucial juncture — at every
fork in the road — we have been there for Israel. Every single time.”
He declared that “if during this political season you hear some
questions regarding my administration’s support for Israel, remember
that it’s not backed up by the facts. And remember that the U.S.-Israel
relationship is simply too important to be distorted by partisan
politics. America’s national security is too important. Israel’s
security is too important.”
But unfortunately, there are a whole bunch of facts that Obama left out of his gauzy recitation of his record on Israel. Dan Senor, Mitt Romney’s top foreign policy advisor, provides a helpful chronology detailing the Obama’s rocky relationship with Israel.
And anticipating that the president might leave a bunch of things out of his speech, the conservative Emergency Committee for Israel commissioned a 30-minute documentary of what you didn’t hear from Obama. It is worth the time to watch:
But unfortunately, there are a whole bunch of facts that Obama left out of his gauzy recitation of his record on Israel. Dan Senor, Mitt Romney’s top foreign policy advisor, provides a helpful chronology detailing the Obama’s rocky relationship with Israel.
And anticipating that the president might leave a bunch of things out of his speech, the conservative Emergency Committee for Israel commissioned a 30-minute documentary of what you didn’t hear from Obama. It is worth the time to watch:
How I would check Iran’s nuclear ambition
By Mitt Romney
Mitt Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, is a Republican candidate for president.
It Just Ain't So. by Walter E. Williams
The U.S. Census
Bureau reports that 2011 manufacturing output grew by 11 percent,
to nearly $5 trillion. Were our manufacturing sector considered
a nation with its own gross domestic product, it would be the world's
fourth-richest economy. Manufacturing productivity has doubled since
1987, and manufacturing output has risen by one-half. However, over
the past two decades, manufacturing employment has fallen about
25 percent. For some people, that means our manufacturing sector
is sick. By that criterion, our agriculture sector shares that "sickness,"
only worse and for a longer duration.
A Biblical Case for Ron Paul on Four Issues of Importance to Christians. by Michael Eversden
In the debate
among Christians about who should be the Republican nominee for
president, the discussion is unfortunately informed more often by
the Gospel According to O’Reilly and the Book of Limbaugh rather
than the Bible. I have therefore undertaken in this article to apply
Biblical principles to four issues that are under discussion in
this year’s presidential campaign, which are or should be important
to Christians, including foreign policy, life, education, and monetary
policy. I conclude that Ron Paul’s positions are by far the most
consistent with Biblical principles and indeed that the other candidates
have decidedly unbiblical views on these issues.
It Usually Ends With Ed Crane. by Murray N. Rothbard
This article
was first published in the January-April, 1981 issue of
Libertarian
Forum, Vol. 14.1-2.
Purged from
Cato!
On Black Friday,
March 27, 1981, at 9:00 A.M. in San Francisco, the "libertarian"
power elite of the Cato Institute, consisting of President Edward
H. Crane III and Other Shareholder Charles G. Koch, revealed its
true nature and its cloven hoof. Crane, aided and abetted by Koch,
ordered me to leave Cato's regular quarterly board meeting, even
though I am a shareholder and a founding board member of the Cato
Institute. The Crane/Koch action was not only iniquitous and high-handed
but also illegal, as my attorneys informed them before and during
the meeting. They didn't care. What's more, as will be explained
shortly, in order to accomplish this foul deed to their own satisfaction,
Crane/Koch literally appropriated and confiscated the shares which
I had naively left in the Cato Wichita office for "safekeeping,"
an act clearly in violation of our agreement as well as contrary
to every tenet of libertarian principle.
The Stupid and the Dishonest Join the Attacks on Ron Paul. by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
Yet another
neocon Republican establishment political hack has demonstrated
ignorance, deceit, and bad manners in yet another attack on Ron
Paul. This time it is one Jeffrey Lord, a "contributing editor"
to The American Spectator magazine. Writing in a January
15 article on the Philly.com Web site, Lord feigns outrage over
the fact that five years ago Ron Paul told NBC’s "Meet the
Press" that the Civil War was unnecessary to end slavery. Lord
is being deceitful here by taking what Ron Paul said out of context.
I remember Ron Paul’s appearance on that show, and the point he
was making was that all the rest of the world – the British, Spaniards,
French, Dutch, Danes, Swedes, the Northern states in the U.S. –
ended slavery peacefully in the nineteenth century. His point
was that we should have done what the British did, and used tax
dollars to purchase the freedom of the slaves and then ended it
forever. That, Said Ron Paul, would have been preferable to a war
that ended up killing over 650,000 Americans (850,000 according
the the very latest historical research) while destroying a large
part of the U.S. economy. Lord is obviously ignorant of all of this
history.
Ayatollah Santorum the Sanctimonious (ASS). by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
In a January
18 interview with Glenn Beck Rick Santorum decided to compare his
view of the Constitution with that of Ron Paul. His statements can
only be described as delusional and totalitarian.
Santorum first
claimed to have read an eighteenth-century dictionary that defined
happiness as "to do the morally right thing." This is
how the founding fathers defined happiness, he said. This is Santorum’s
definition of "happiness," not the founding fathers. It’s
a good bet he is lying when claiming to have read an eighteenth-century
dictionary. (But I suppose anything is possible with a man who brought
his deceased infant home who died two hours after birth and slept
with it after showing it to his children, as Santorum admits to
have done).
Charles Koch Makes a Good Point by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
The word on
the street (K Street, that is) is that Charles Koch's lawsuit against
the CATO Institute is motivated by his desire to abandon what he
once believed was a potentially successful Grand Strategy and replace
it with a different institutional strategy. The Grand Strategy was
explained to me back in the early 1980s by Richard Fink, the longtime
head of the Koch Foundation, when we were both young assistant professors
of economics at George Mason University (and before Richie was with
the Koch Foundation). The strategy was to use institutions such
as George Mason to educate undergraduate and graduate students in
free-market economics who would then work for various arms of the
Kochtopus, for members of congress or the executive branch, or become
journalists or elected officials themselves. In other words, the
strategy was all about influencing or taking over the Washington
Establishment.
The Future of the Euro
by Philipp Bagus
The problems of the eurozone are ultimately malinvestments. In Greece
these days the struggle continues about who will ultimately foot the
bill for these investments. During the early 2000s an expansionary
monetary policy lowered interest rates artificially. Entrepreneurs
financed investment projects that only looked profitable due to the low
interest rates but were not sustained by real savings. Housing bubbles
and consumption booms developed in the periphery.
Regulatory-Industrial Complex
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.
Socialists want socialism for everyone else, but capitalism for
themselves, while capitalists want capitalism for everyone else, but
socialism for themselves.
Neither Ted Kennedy nor Jane Fonda practices a vow of poverty, nor are they taking any homeless into their mansions, while too many big companies try to short-circuit the market with government privileges. And one way they do it is through the regulatory agencies that acne Washington, DC.
[The Left, the Right, and the State (1990; 2008)]
Neither Ted Kennedy nor Jane Fonda practices a vow of poverty, nor are they taking any homeless into their mansions, while too many big companies try to short-circuit the market with government privileges. And one way they do it is through the regulatory agencies that acne Washington, DC.
Stealing Assets, Ensuring Poverty. by Douglas French
Here in South Africa there is plenty of talk of nationalizing the
nation’s mines, especially the country’s platinum mines. After all, SA
is no longer the world leader in gold production, while the country
still produces 80% of the world’s platinum. In fact platinum group
metals (PGM) account for the bulk of SA’s mineral value.
However, as Nazmeera Moola points out in her “economic viewpoint” column in the February 24th Financial Mail, PGM production has been falling since 2007 at the same time profit margins fell, despite elevated prices. Ms. Moola writes that margins dropped 5-10 percent last year from the previous year, with rising wage and electricity costs to blame.
However, as Nazmeera Moola points out in her “economic viewpoint” column in the February 24th Financial Mail, PGM production has been falling since 2007 at the same time profit margins fell, despite elevated prices. Ms. Moola writes that margins dropped 5-10 percent last year from the previous year, with rising wage and electricity costs to blame.
The State Is a Harsh Mistress
by David Masten
When I mention that I believe that it is not the proper role of
government to subsidize research in space technology, the looks I
receive from my fellow aerospace engineering classmates seem to suggest
that they want to send me to the dark side of the moon (on the
taxpayers' dime).
If there's one libertarian position that is exceedingly difficult to argue, it is the notion that scientific research should not be the concern of the state. This essay will focus on outlining two possible approaches that may allow my dear reader to explain free-market space technology to an outsider without sounding like a green-eyed Martian. These are as follows:
If there's one libertarian position that is exceedingly difficult to argue, it is the notion that scientific research should not be the concern of the state. This essay will focus on outlining two possible approaches that may allow my dear reader to explain free-market space technology to an outsider without sounding like a green-eyed Martian. These are as follows:
Who Were the Cameralists?
by Murray N. Rothbard
In contrast to Great Britain, the German-speaking countries were
predictably highly resistant to the spread of Smithian views. They had
been ruled, ever since the late 16th century, by cameralism.
Cameralists, named after the German royal treasure chamber, the Kammer,
propounded an extreme form of mercantilism, concentrating even more
than their confreres in the West on building up state power, and
subordinating all parts of the economy and polity to the state and its
bureaucracy. Whereas mercantilist writers were generally pamphleteers
scrambling for some particular form of state advantage, the cameralists
were either bureaucrats in one of the 360 tyrannical German states, or
else university professors advising the princes and their bureaucracy
how best to maximize their revenue and power. As Albion Small put it: to
the cameralists
Seventeen Years of Boom and Bust
by Clyde W. Richey
The Federal Reserve must bear responsibility for our current
recession. The seeds for this recession were clearly planted in 1995 and
led to unsustainable booms and busts, and later to high unemployment,
increased consumer prices, failed companies, and increased debt.
Appropriate at this time is an overview of the Federal Reserve's booms
and busts and the shocking similarities with those of the banks before
the Federal Reserve was in existence — and a consideration of actions
for prevention of these destructive booms and busts in order to
establish a more healthy economy.
Monday, March 5, 2012
How I Would Not Lead the World Bank
Do NOT, under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, pick me.
BY WILLIAM EASTERLY
‘This Is How You Elect a Fucking President?’
Putin cracks down on Moscow's protesters before the victory tears are dry on his face.
BY JULIA IOFFE
The Petrostates of America
Yes, the U.S. economy is addicted to oil -- selling it.
BY STEVEN R. KOPITS |
Suicide attack on Afghan NATO base where Korans burned
Suicide attack on Afghan NATO base where Korans burned
KABUL |
(Reuters) - A suicide bomber killed at
least two civilians Monday after detonating explosives at the gates of
the NATO base where copies of the Koran were burned, Afghan officials
said.Tell the Truth Already!
“Dismounted complex blast injuries” caused by improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in Afghanistan are felling our soldiers and Marines so frequently today that men are routinely banking their sperm as another item on the checklist before they deploy for the war.
They’re doing that because a dismounted complex blast injury — now being called the “new signature wound” of the Afghan conflict — can not only cause the amputation of multiple limbs, but often results in irreversible genital and pelvic injuries, meaning urinary tracts, genitals and bowels are being destroyed even as the victim stays alive.
Emergency amputations in these cases sever the legs so close to the hip that it’s sometimes impossible to fit a prosthesis, and sexual function is gone forever.
Obama’s Red Line
War with Iran has just gotten more likely
“We’ve got Israel’s back” – that is the message President Obama sent out ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to the US for a crucial summit at the White House, and he did it in an interview granted to one of the leading pro-Israel voices in the media, Jeffrey Goldberg, former Israeli prison guard and IDF soldier, now a columnist for The Atlantic. In that interview, Obama basically telegraphed his capitulation to the Israelis, who are demanding the establishment of “red lines” Iran may not cross without provoking an attack:
“[O]ur assessment, which is shared by the Israelis, is that Iran does not yet have a nuclear weapon and is not yet in a position to obtain a nuclear weapon without us having a pretty long lead time in which we will know that they are making that attempt.”
In Russia, thousands protest presidential election results
Reporting from Moscow—
With police helicopters hovering low over central Moscow and security forces blanketing the streets, at least 20,000 protesters gathered Monday to accuse Vladimir Putin of stealingRussia's presidential election and demand his immediate resignation.
Rush Limbaugh: Still has the biggest sponsor on his side
File photo: Rush Limbaugh.
(Associated Press)
Rush Limbaugh
is probably not sweating this one, folks. The critics keep piling on.
But the immensely popular talk radio host has the biggest "sponsor" of
all on his side: Clear Channel radio network.Drug allegations may hamper former Mexico ruling party's return. The PRI candidate for president is the front-runner. But allegations of drug payoffs involving a former PRI governor could remind voters of the party's past.
Mexico's former ruling
party, the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI, hopes to ride back
to power behind Enrique Pena Nieto, its handsome young presidential
candidate, and a rejuvenated image.
(Alexandre Meneghini, Associated Press )
Reporting from Mexico City—
No comments:
Post a Comment