Saturday, March 10, 2012

Obama Is a Lock

The American public loves recession, war, tyranny.

The near-certainty that Mitt Romney will be defeated by Barack Obama in November is both intuitive and numerical.
Following his important if unspectacular victories in six out of 10 state primaries on Tuesday, former Massachusetts Gov. Romney is now on a slow but secure track to be the Republican Party’s nominee for president of the United States.
In fact, let's skip the election entirely. There is no evidence that Romney can unseat President Obama in November. A recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll has Obama beating Romney handily in a one-to-one contest, with Obama drawing 50 percent support to Romney’s 44 percent.

Ron Paul Revolution: What Now?

The Paul campaign definitely isn’t winning first ballot. But there's still much to win.

After Super Tuesday, it’s officially official: Ron Paul won’t go into Tampa with enough delegates to win the presidential nomination.
Still, because of the unbound nature of 197 extant delegates from caucus states, and his campaign’s diligent efforts to ensure that their people rise through the convoluted GOP state convention process, it’s likely that he has many more committed delegates in hand than the media counts.
And as still-excited Paul partisans will tell you: Paul can’t go into Tampa with enough to win on first ballot. As The Daily Beast points out, it seems unlikely that Mitt Romney, clearly in the lead now, can do so either.
This raises speculations about a brokered convention, and Paul’s campaign chair Jesse Benton sees that as hopeful for Ron Paul—in fact, it’s the only hope he’s got to actually get the nomination.
Anything can happen at a brokered convention—in our imaginations at least. Given the general attitudes of the average GOP stalwart, though, it’s hard to imagine Ron Paul coming out of one a winner. Ronald Reagan in 1976 made quite the push to deny leader Gerald Ford the nomination when Ford lacked a clear majority going into the convention, and even Reagan, god-saint of modern Republicanism, failed. Former GOP superstrategist Roger Stone, who lived through those days, reminded me that Reagan actually represented the views and enthusiasms of the mass of GOP activists in his day in a way Ron Paul does not now. This makes it even less likely Paul will succeed with any last-minute Tampa coup.

The Southern Poverty Law Center Is Now Writing About Pickup Artists as Hate Groups

|
The Southern Poverty Law Center, founded in 1971 as a civil rights law firm, has released its latest "Intelligence Report" on hate groups in the United States. This year's report contains a new category: the Manosphere.
From the SPLC's introduction to the misogyny report:

Remy: Cough Drops-The Mandate (featuring Sandra Fluke)


Remy crashes Sandra Fluke's Congressional testimony to demand a mandate for his cough drop addiction.
"Remy: Cough Drops-The Mandate" is one of a series of collaborations between Remy and Reason.tv. To watch Remy's other videos, go to youtube.com/goremy.

Adam Smith vs. Crony Capitalism


The Scottish philosopher's suspicions about business people were well-founded.

I admit it: I like Adam Smith. His perceptiveness never fails to impress. True, he didn’t foresee the marginal revolution that Carl Menger would launch a century later (with, less significantly in my view, Jevons and Walras), but give the guy a break. The Wealth of Nations is a great piece of work.
One thing I find refreshing in Smith is his wariness of business people. This is something we ought to frequently remind market skeptics. Smith knew the difference between being sympathetic to the competitive economy—which he called the “system of natural liberty”—and being sympathetic to owners of capital (who might well have acquired it by less-than-kosher means, that is, through political privilege). He knew something about business lobbies.

Romney Beats Obama 48%-43% In New Rasmussen Poll

Obamney Twins just want to play with you. The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for today has former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney leading President Barack Obama by five percentage points:

How Andrew Breitbart Changed the News

Love him or hate him, he demonstrated how to build your own media outlet.

Note: This piece originally ran at CNN.com on March 2, 2012. Read it there.
(CNN) -- To get a sense of just how polarizing a figure new media innovator Andrew Breitbart was, get a load of this tweet from Slate's Matt Yglesias that went out mere hours after the news of Breitbart's unexpected death at age 43 broke: "The world outlook is slightly improved with @AndrewBrietbart dead."

How to Secure our Borders

No Wow Factor in Jobs Report

10 Reasons Obama Will Not Be Re-Elected

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- None of the four GOP contenders has emerged as a star candidate yet. But it won't take a star to defeat President Obama. His record over the last four years will be reason enough to vote him out of office.
1. The economy is struggling. Since 2008 the U.S. economic clock has been turned back 10 years. If congressional gridlock continues The Economist reckons it will continue declining. The only country that slid more than the U.S. is Greece.
>>Also see: 10 Reasons Obama Will Be Re-Elected
2. Gas is more and more expensive. Obama said, "There is no silver bullet" to temporary rising gas prices. Temporary? On Obama's watch gas has risen from an average of $1.85 a gallon to near $4 today. He does have a solution: Americans will drive cars that get 55 mpg. In the small print, there's a warning: These cars are small. They have a clutch and roll-down windows.
3. The war in Afghanistan is a fiasco. Obama's good war has turned into a mess. We are eyeing a second Vietnam.

Voters won’t always obsess on GOP mess

Voters won’t always obsess on GOP mess

headshotJohn Podhoretz
For Republicans mired in despair and Democrats awash in joyous disbelief, a note of comfort to one and warning to the other: There will come a time when the 2012 election will cease to revolve around the GOP nominating process and begin to focus on the accomplishments — or lack thereof — of the incumbent president.
The Republican Party has not conducted itself well over the past few months, to put it mildly. Andthe conservative movement has been far too easily diverted into unserious nonsense and pointless controversies. That may have helped the fund-raising pitches of some activist groups, but it has set back the overall cause of articulating the core conservative ideas in a manner that will win over people not already sitting in the pews.
What’s he got? Obama’s recent record only looks good in comparison to his first three years.
AP
What’s he got? Obama’s recent record only looks good in comparison to his first three years.
Preaching to the converted is important, but in election years, the secret to success is evangelizing — broadening the message and giving it a chance to resonate, hit home and affect the political choices of people who don’t yet believe.

Dershowitz to Newsmax: Obama Could Be ‘Chamberlain of 21st Century’

By Martin Gould and Ashley Martell

President Barack Obama is in danger of going down in history as “the Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century,” if he fails to stop Iran’s development of the nuclear bomb, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz tells Newsmax.TV.

Voters won’t always obsess on GOP mess

Voters won’t always obsess on GOP mess

headshotJohn Podhoretz
For Republicans mired in despair and Democrats awash in joyous disbelief, a note of comfort to one and warning to the other: There will come a time when the 2012 election will cease to revolve around the GOP nominating process and begin to focus on the accomplishments — or lack thereof — of the incumbent president.
The Republican Party has not conducted itself well over the past few months, to put it mildly. Andthe conservative movement has been far too easily diverted into unserious nonsense and pointless controversies. That may have helped the fund-raising pitches of some activist groups, but it has set back the overall cause of articulating the core conservative ideas in a manner that will win over people not already sitting in the pews.
What’s he got? Obama’s recent record only looks good in comparison to his first three years.
AP
What’s he got? Obama’s recent record only looks good in comparison to his first three years.
Preaching to the converted is important, but in election years, the secret to success is evangelizing — broadening the message and giving it a chance to resonate, hit home and affect the political choices of people who don’t yet believe.

Innovation in China

From brawn to brain

If China is to excel at innovation, the state must give entrepreneurs more freedom


THE end of cheap China is at hand. Blue-collar labour costs in Guangdong and other coastal hubs have been rising at double-digit rates for a decade. Workers in the hinterland, too, are demanding—and receiving—huge pay increases. China is no longer a place where manufacturers can go to find ultra-cheap hands (see article). Other countries, such as Vietnam, are much cheaper. What will this mean for China and the world?

Auschwitz complex

Israel, Iran and America

  by M.S.
DURING his meeting with Barack Obama on Monday, Bibi Netanyahu said Israel "must have the ability always to defend itself, by itself, against any threat."
"I believe that's why you appreciate, Mr. President, that Israel must reserve the right to defend itself," Netanyahu said. "After all, that's the very purpose of the Jewish state, to restore to the Jewish people control over our destiny. That's why my supreme responsibility as prime minister of Israel is to ensure that Israel remains master of its fate."
News flash: Israel is not master of its fate. It's not terribly surprising that a country with less than 8m inhabitants is not master of its fate. Switzerland, Sweden, Serbia and Portugal are not masters of their fates. These days, many countries with populations of 100m or more can hardly be said to be masters of their fates. Britain and China aren't masters of their fates, and even the world's overwhelmingly largest economy, the United States, isn't really master of its fate.
But Israel has even less control over its own destiny than Portugal or Britain do. The main reason is that, unlike those countries, Israel refuses to give up its empire. Israel is unable to sustain its imperial ambitions in the West Bank, or even to articulate them coherently. Having allowed its founding ideology to carry it relentlessly and unthinkingly into what Gershom Gorenburg calls an "Accidental Empire" of radical religious-nationalist settlements that openly defy its own courts, Israel is politically incapable of extricating itself. The partisan battles engendered by its occupation of Palestinian territory render it less and less able to pull itself free. It is immobilised, pinned down, in a conflict that is gradually killing it. Countries facing imperial twilight, like Britain in the late 1940s, are often seized by a sense of desperate paralysis. For over a decade, the tone of Israeli politics has been a mix of panic, despair, hysteria and resignation.

Morning in America?

America's economy

  by R.A. | WASHINGTON

IT HAS been no easy road getting here, and the path ahead looks rocky, but a real recovery seems to be developing for America's long-suffering workers. This morning, the Bureau of Labour Statistics released new data on American employment, which showed a third consecutive month of robust job growth. Where previous reports contained a hint of weakness here or there, the fundamentals of this report look almost uniformly strong.

Creative Californians Redefine Rahm’s ‘Rule One’

 

Across the Golden State the relationship between government and citizens is changing for the better.
Within days of President Obama’s election in 2008, his pick for chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, uttered words that came to define the administration’s view of the burgeoning economic collapse: “Rule one: Never allow a crisis to go to waste. They are opportunities to do big things.” Such “big things” were to come from the federal government in the forms of a massive stimulus package and a nationalized healthcare plan.

Obama’s part-time job recovery

By James Pethokoukis


The economy is adding jobs, though not enough to bring down the sky-high unemployment rate. But it’s not just the quantity of jobs that’s a problem, it’s the quality, too.

How to Beat ObamaCare in Court

 
Somehow, the leading litigators contesting the Obama healthcare law have missed the elephant in the room.
If we can accept the maxim that war is sometimes too important to be left to the generals, then we may now have a Supreme Court case that is too important to be left to the lawyers. In State of Florida et al. v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, the main action in which the U.S. Supreme Court is to consider the constitutionality of ObamaCare (more formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or PPACA for short), there is an elephant in the room that somehow the leading litigators contesting the Obama health law have missed.

How Obama’s Energy Policy Will Kill Jobs

 
President Obama is once again proposing selectively punitive treatment of the oil and natural gas industry, one of the strongest job-creating sectors of the U.S. economy.
The oil and natural gas industry, one of the strongest job-creating sectors of the U.S. economy, has been unfavorably targeted by President Obama’s proposed 2013 fiscal year (FY) federal budget. To start with, Obama is proposing, for the fourth consecutive year, to repeal Section 199 of the “American Jobs Creation Act.” If enacted, this selectively punitive treatment would increase taxes on oil and natural gas companies by almost $12 billion over the next decade. It could possibly jeopardize some of the millions of American jobs supported by oil and natural gas producers and prolong the sub-par “jobless recovery.”

Gold is Free Market Money | Walter Block

Inflation and the Bolsheviks | Yuri N. Maltsev

Teaching Tomorrow's Economists

by
I am happy to announce that the Teacher's Manual is now available for my introductory textbook, Lessons for the Young Economist. For those readers who are unfamiliar with it, let me explain that the student text was designed with junior-high students in mind, but it is applicable for younger, precocious students, and also even for adults who never got a solid grounding in free-market economic principles.
The newly available manual is intended to guide the teacher through the course, giving the broader context of the material in the student text, as well as offering suggested test questions and further activities. It can be used by classroom teachers, but is also ideally suited to homeschooling instruction by parents who may not be confident in their own economics knowledge.

No comments: