Monday, January 30, 2012

The 6 killer apps of Western civilization: Part 1: Competition

By Henrik Temp
Check out this great TED talk, in which British historian Niall Ferguson explains his answer to the question of why Western civilization achieved such a clear dominance over the rest of the world.
The presentation is a summary of Ferguson’s book Civilization: The West and the Rest. I highly recommend reading it; it expands on the points from the TED talk and is thoroughly enjoyable. What I’d like to do here is investigate, one at a time, the state of the six “killer apps” in modern America.
Let’s start with Ferguson’s first “killer app”: competition. Here’s a little more background from the book:

Look at just how progressive the U.S. tax system is

By James Pethokoukis
Great, great table from the Tax Foundation looking at the average real income tax rate for various income groups. People with adjusted gross incomes of less than $100,000 pay 8 percent or less. People making $500,000 or more pay no lower than 22 percent on average. The overall average rate is 11 percent. Looks pretty progressive to me …

Why the Reagan Recovery was much more impressive than Obama’s

By James Pethokoukis
My pal Joe Weisenthal over at Business Insider just wrote a piece—in response to a post I wrote earlier today—with the delightfully provocative and contrarian headline, “Why The Obama Recovery Has Been Much More Impressive Than Reagan’s.”
Nope, I’m not making this up. See for yourself:
Let’s be perfectly clear, the Reagan Recovery (RR) has been far stronger than the Obama Recovery (OR). I think that is beyond dispute, really.

The green-energy climb-down continues

The rain in Spain may stay mainly on the plain, but it won’t be falling on giant solar panel arrays for very long: Spain is in full retreat on its ill-advised renewable push. That won’t come as a surprise to AEI readers, since I’ve been writing about Spain’s failing and corrupt renewables regime (along with the rest of Europe) for a good year now.
As I wrote last year:

Fear and loathing of the Fed

By Daniel Hanson
As the GOP primary heats up, it appears that Ron Paul’s “End the Fed” message is catching on. In South Carolina, Gingrich dove head-first into the Gold Standard fray, promising a “gold commission” modeled after the double-digit inflation-battling commission built by Ronald Reagan (that, coincidentally, overwhelmingly rejected returning to a gold standard, and had Ron Paul as a member).
Ron Paul, a subscriber to Austrian Economics, has been advocating a return to gold for years. Part of his argument is that gold’s meteoric rise signals impending doom for the dollar. Between the massive debt overhang and distrust of the Fed, Paul argues that people will lose faith in the U.S. financial and monetary system.
Noteworthy, then, are the returns on asset classes in 2011.
If, as Paul and Gingrich argue, we are facing economic doom, shouldn’t gold be at the top of the list? And shouldn’t interest rates be rising? And shouldn’t inflation be going through the roof?
Yet, as AEI economist John Makin notes:

The Obama stimulus: How Big Government screwed up the Big Spend

By James Pethokoukis
Recall the original Obama economic team. It consisted of President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and White House economists Lawrence Summers, Christina Romer, Austan Goolsbee, and Jared Bernstein. It was the Democrats’ Best and Brightest—but not one with a smidgen of executive experience in either the private or public sector. And into their hands was entrusted an $800 billion stimulus spending plan, a package whose details were fleshed out by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. What could go wrong?

Fixing Student Loans: Let’s Give Colleges Some ‘Skin in the Game’

  
What lessons on student loans can be learned from the searing national misadventure with mortgages?
There are provocative parallels between student loans and the mortgages that created the disastrous housing bubble. In both cases, the government promoted plausible goals— higher education and home ownership—to excess, through the overexpansion of debt to levels beyond the repayment ability of a large percentage of borrowers. In both cases, the government guaranteed much of the credit, putting the ultimate risk of bad debts on taxpayers. In both cases, debt expansion drove the price of the object being financed (colleges and houses) to heights sustainable only if debt could always be increasing. In mortgages, it could not, and the subsequent collapse raises the question: will there be a similar outcome with student loans?
Professor Richard Vedder, considering the question of a student loan bubble, recently concluded that the worst idea ever “was the creation of federally subsidized student loans in the first place.” Can any lessons from the searing national misadventure with mortgages be usefully applied to student loans? I believe so.

Why Growth Matters More than Debt

  
The proper question is not how will America pay foreigner creditors back but rather what will maintain China and Japan’s desire to buy low-interest Treasury securities from us?
The U.S. federal debt recently eclipsed $15 trillion, and is still climbing. That has generated headlines and raised a lot of questions. How should we behave towards China, supposedly our biggest creditor? Has the debt burden become unsustainable? How will our kids and grandkids ever pay off the debt we’ve been accumulating? The answers contain some surprises.

No comments: